The Devoss and Porter article on Napster talks about the controversies with file sharing. On the bottom of the second page, it states:
“Napster should matter to writing teachers because it represents a paradigm shift: from an older view of writing as alphabetic text on paper, intended for print distribution, to an emergent and ill-understood view of writing as weaving digital media for distribution across networked spaces for various audiences engaged in different types of reading. Writing is no longer just alphabetic text—writing is also audio and video. And writing is also hypertext and the delivery of multimedia content via the Internet and the Web. And writing is chunks of tagged text and data floating within databases and underneath the Internet in P2P spaces.”
As a future teacher, I feel like there are so many things for teachers to worry about. It’s hard enough to determine plagiarism, but now they are adding the twist of online text and that makes it even more difficult. How are teachers supposed to determine plagiarism in students’ writing?
The article also talks about the “death” of Napster. I’ll admit I used to have Napster and engaged in illegal file downloading/sharing but there are still programs such as Limewire out there for people to download illegally. So when are they going to require users to pay for Limewire? It seems like an impossible task to accomplish.
Later on in the document, the authors talk about the “value added” to buying a CD versus file sharing. They say:
“The value-added that is missing in digital filesharing is, in part, nostalgic—the
feel of the CD case and the opening of a Brand New Product. The value-added, however, is
also tangible—the artwork and inserts that come with a purchased CD.”
I personally buy CDs just for that reason. For certain artists, I will intentionally go out and buy the CD for the artwork. It’s a sort of authenticity about having the actual CD in my hands that makes me appreciate the CD more.
Are people looking too much into this copyright and plagiarism thing? Just like the other article, “Understanding Internet Plagiarism” by Rebecca Moore Howard, it is believed that plagiarism is becoming increasingly harder to deal with. Howard states:
“In all its forms, new media constitutes yet another revolution in access to text, and one of
its controversies is the anxiety of authenticity. With so much text universally accessible (at least potentially), readers are suddenly detecting far more plagiarism than ever before. “Are today’s students more unethical than in years past?” asked Brian Hansen, the Congressional Quarterly researcher who interviewed me in 2003. My answer is, “How would we know? On what basis could comparisons be made?”
This right here shows how complex the situation has become. This is the beginning of a whole new textual universe. Howard goes onto say,
“The very fact that the question arises, though, indicates a cultural fear that indeed this might be the case. This fear arises from a belief in widespread plagiarism—plagiarism that, because of boundless access to text, cannot be controlled. And that belief arises from the availability of text online not just to writers but to readers. It is readers’ access to copious text that makes them believe in writers’ plagiarism.”
So the fact is, the most text there is to have access to, the more chances and reasons to believe that students are plagiarizing. Is there any way to fix this situation?
~Meg
Read Full Post »